If a judge sets a bail amount differing from the scheduled amount, what must they do?

When a judge sets a bail amount that differs from the established schedule, it is crucial for the judge to state the reasons for this decision. This requirement ensures transparency and accountability in the judicial process, allowing for an understanding of the rationale behind the chosen bail amount. By articulating the reasons, the judge provides insight into the considerations taken into account, which may include factors such as the nature of the crime, the defendant's flight risk, criminal history, or other relevant circumstances.

This practice serves several purposes: it helps to uphold the principles of fairness and due process, provides a record for any potential appeals or reviews, and ensures that there is a clear justification for the bail amount that can be scrutinized if necessary. Moreover, this transparency helps maintain public confidence in the judicial system.

The other options do not align with the legal requirements or best practices. While recording decisions in detail is important, the specific emphasis on stating the rationale is what makes option B particularly significant. Simply discussing with the defendant or notifying the prosecutor does not capture the broader legal obligation to justify the bail amount publicly.